Technology expertise
Pick the stack that fits your roadmap, not the other way around.
Thirteen production-grade technologies, each owned by senior specialists who ship them every day. Browse what we build with — and on each tech page, see the team, projects, and qualify-fit criteria that decide whether we're right for you.
Live stack
13 technologies
React
Component systems that hold together at scale
2
Frontend
6
Backend
4
Mobile
1
Design
5.0 client rating
Avg. 6yr tenure
50+
Projects Shipped
30+
Specialists in-house
6 Years
Average Senior Engineer Tenure
The catalog
Thirteen technologies, four product surfaces, one bench.
Filter by surface or search by skill — every card links to a full technology page with the team, the qualify section, and shipped projects.
Frontend
2 technologiesReact
Component systems that hold together at scale
Production React with TypeScript, Suspense data flows, and a design-system mindset — not yet-another-CRA.
Next.js
App Router, RSC, edge — used in anger
Marketing sites that score 95+ Lighthouse, and product apps that ship App Router + Server Actions correctly.
Backend
6 technologiesNode.js
JavaScript on the server, kept boring
Long-running Node services with backpressure, structured logging, and observability you can debug at 2am.
Express.js
The minimal API surface that just works
When the team just needs a thin REST layer over Postgres — typed routes, JWT, validation, no ceremony.
NestJS
Modular monoliths the team won't outgrow
Module-per-domain, DI from day one, and TypeORM/Prisma adapters wired the way the docs actually intend.
Django
Batteries-included — and we know which to swap
DRF APIs, Celery workers, and admin panels that survive growth, paired with Postgres and proper migrations.
Flask
Right-sized Python services without the framework tax
When Django is too much; SQLAlchemy + Marshmallow + a clean blueprint structure that scales to many endpoints.
Python
From data pipelines to ML inference and back
Beyond web frameworks — DAGs in Airflow, ML inference, scripting glue, and CLI tooling for your engineers.
Mobile
4 technologiesFlutter
One codebase, two stores, zero compromise on feel
BLoC architecture, native channels for the 5% the framework can't reach, and a CI that ships to both stores.
React Native
Share logic with web, keep native where it matters
Expo + EAS for the easy 80%, native modules wired in TypeScript when product needs them. No Hermes-vs-JSC drama.
iOS
Swift, SwiftUI, and Apple-grade attention to detail
Modern SwiftUI with UIKit interop, CloudKit sync, and Crashlytics-clean releases that keep their App Store rating.
Android
Kotlin + Compose, on every screen size that matters
Jetpack Compose UIs, Coroutines + Flow data layers, and Play Console release tracks managed properly.
How we pick
Choosing a stack is an engineering decision, not a fashion one.
The stacks above aren't a marketing menu. They're the four-step gauntlet every engagement runs through before a single PR opens.
Audit constraints
Team skills, hiring market, runtime budget, infra you already pay for. The stack lives inside these.
Pick the boring 80%
Use the framework the docs are written for. Reach for novel tools only where they earn their keep.
Prove with one slice
Build one production-shaped feature end-to-end before scaling the team. Catches integration mistakes early.
Hand over with rails
Lint, types, CI, runbooks, on-call docs. Your team owns the code on day one, not month six.
FAQ
Things teams ask before signing the SOW.
Direct answers, no marketing prose.
Yes — a typical product engagement uses one frontend, one backend, one mobile stack, and shared design tooling. We staff cross-functional product pods around the work.
Have a stack in mind, or need help picking one?
Tell us the problem, the team, and the timeline. We'll pitch a stack and a staffing plan in 48 hours — no NDAs required for the first conversation.
